
The best of both worlds? Dynamic-priced contracts
We set out to determine if – and under what conditions – dynamic-priced contracts could benefit both the shipper and the carrier. Specifically, we aimed to identify conditions in which dynamic-priced contracts resulted in lower total costs for the shipper, higher acceptance rates and higher revenue for the carrier.
The best of both worlds? Dynamic-priced contracts
We set out to determine if – and under what conditions – dynamic-priced contracts could benefit both the shipper and the carrier. Specifically, we aimed to identify conditions in which dynamic-priced contracts resulted in lower total costs for the shipper, higher acceptance rates and higher revenue for the carrier.

Determining the dataset
To do so, we worked with a detailed transactional dataset tracking 70 United States shippers’ dry van truckload shipments (moving greater than 250 miles) from 2015 to 2019. The data included shipment contract price, pickup and drop-off locations, lead time, carrier attributes and whether the shipment was accepted by the contracted carrier (and if not, whether a backup carrier accepted the shipment or if it went on the spot market). To better inform carrier acceptance decisions, we built a highly accurate predictive model that determines the probability that an individual load will be accepted by a contracted carrier given a set of attributes known based on our previous research. These attributes included whether the contracted (and backup) carrier is an asset-based provider or a broker, lane demand patterns (such as consistency and frequency of tendered volume to the contracted carrier), whether the shipment is considered surge volume above and beyond the expected weekly volume on that lane and – importantly – contract price relative to the lane-specific market price at that time. This final element allows us to measure carrier acceptance rates (and thus, expected price a shipper pays due to rejections) under our two pricing scenarios of interest: traditional fixed-price contracts and dynamic-priced contracts (as illustrated in Figure 2).
Dry van truckload shipments
- Shipment contract price
- Pickup and drop-off locations
- Lead time
- Carrier attributes
- Shipment accept by contracted carrier

Predictive model based on influencing attributes
- Carrier is asset provider
- Carrier is broker
- Lane demand patterns
- Surge volume shipment
- Contract price relative to market price


The results of the dataset
Shippers can expect
Carriers can expect
Reduction in cost
Increase in carrier acceptance rate
Higher revenues
Shippers can expect
Reduction in cost
Increase in carrier acceptance rate
Carriers can expect
Higher revenues
For the lanes on which traditional long-term fixed-price contracts are failing – low volume, high demand variability, and low frequency – dynamic-priced contracts do result in a benefit for both shippers and carriers along all three performance metrics. The modeling and analysis showed that shippers can expect a 1-5% reduction in cost, 2-4% increase in carrier acceptance rate, and carriers can expect 1-9% higher revenues.
To verify these results, we conducted a small-scale pilot experiment with a large agricultural shipper in the United States. We rolled out dynamic-priced contracts on a subset of lanes with select carriers and conducted a causal inference analysis to determine that the shipper’s reduction in costs was indeed caused by the introduction of dynamic-priced contracts.